Review



epionics spine system  (Epionics Medical GmbH)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Epionics Medical GmbH epionics spine system
    Epionics Spine System, supplied by Epionics Medical GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/epionics+spine/epionics+spine/pm40473750-61-19-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    epionics spine system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Activity Assay:

    Article Title: Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations: is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?
    Article Snippet: In the upright standing, there was a strong, significant correlation (R = 0.73) between the Epionics SPINE and the X-ray recorded lumbar lordosis in all subjects ( ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: A total of 87 individuals showed low mobility (< 40.8°), in Epionics SPINE ® , while Schober test also showed values below 5 cm.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For a total of 187 study participants (49.6%), the results between Epionics SPINE ® and Schober test matched (Fig. ), i.e., both measurement methods indicated either a movement deficit or good mobility.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For the Epionics SPINE ® measurements, there were significant differences in between lumbar lordosis yielding agreement or non-agreement between both assessment tools (Table ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Furthermore, when grouping the individuals of the Epionics SPINE ® cohort by age significantly reduced lumbar lordosis seemed to yield agreement for individuals between age 41–50 years (Table ) as well as 51–65 years.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: RoF reference for good lumbar mobility: Epionics SPINE ® = 40.8°; Idiag M360 ® = 46.04°.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Both studies were approved by the local ethics committee (Epionics SPINE ® : EA4/011/10; Idiag M360 ® : EA1/058/21) and conducted in strict adherence to the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.

    Article Title: Prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia with patient-reported outcomes and mobility measures in axial spondyloarthritis.
    Article Snippet: Patient reported outcomes and objective assessments of disease activity physical function, global health and functioning as well as the BASMI, the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Epionics SPINE (ES) measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK) were collected.

    Battery:

    Article Title: Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations: is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?
    Article Snippet: In the upright standing, there was a strong, significant correlation (R = 0.73) between the Epionics SPINE and the X-ray recorded lumbar lordosis in all subjects ( ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: A total of 87 individuals showed low mobility (< 40.8°), in Epionics SPINE ® , while Schober test also showed values below 5 cm.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For a total of 187 study participants (49.6%), the results between Epionics SPINE ® and Schober test matched (Fig. ), i.e., both measurement methods indicated either a movement deficit or good mobility.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For the Epionics SPINE ® measurements, there were significant differences in between lumbar lordosis yielding agreement or non-agreement between both assessment tools (Table ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Furthermore, when grouping the individuals of the Epionics SPINE ® cohort by age significantly reduced lumbar lordosis seemed to yield agreement for individuals between age 41–50 years (Table ) as well as 51–65 years.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: RoF reference for good lumbar mobility: Epionics SPINE ® = 40.8°; Idiag M360 ® = 46.04°.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Both studies were approved by the local ethics committee (Epionics SPINE ® : EA4/011/10; Idiag M360 ® : EA1/058/21) and conducted in strict adherence to the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.

    Article Title: Prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia with patient-reported outcomes and mobility measures in axial spondyloarthritis.
    Article Snippet: Patient reported outcomes and objective assessments of disease activity physical function, global health and functioning as well as the BASMI, the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Epionics SPINE (ES) measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK) were collected.

    Modification:

    Article Title: Marked differences between continuous long-term and clinical snapshot examinations: is the current standard of back pain diagnostics outdated?
    Article Snippet: In the upright standing, there was a strong, significant correlation (R = 0.73) between the Epionics SPINE and the X-ray recorded lumbar lordosis in all subjects ( ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: A total of 87 individuals showed low mobility (< 40.8°), in Epionics SPINE ® , while Schober test also showed values below 5 cm.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For a total of 187 study participants (49.6%), the results between Epionics SPINE ® and Schober test matched (Fig. ), i.e., both measurement methods indicated either a movement deficit or good mobility.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: For the Epionics SPINE ® measurements, there were significant differences in between lumbar lordosis yielding agreement or non-agreement between both assessment tools (Table ).

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Furthermore, when grouping the individuals of the Epionics SPINE ® cohort by age significantly reduced lumbar lordosis seemed to yield agreement for individuals between age 41–50 years (Table ) as well as 51–65 years.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: RoF reference for good lumbar mobility: Epionics SPINE ® = 40.8°; Idiag M360 ® = 46.04°.

    Article Title: Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility
    Article Snippet: Both studies were approved by the local ethics committee (Epionics SPINE ® : EA4/011/10; Idiag M360 ® : EA1/058/21) and conducted in strict adherence to the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.

    Article Title: Prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia with patient-reported outcomes and mobility measures in axial spondyloarthritis.
    Article Snippet: Patient reported outcomes and objective assessments of disease activity physical function, global health and functioning as well as the BASMI, the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Epionics SPINE (ES) measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK) were collected.



    Similar Products

    epionics spine system  (Epionics Medical GmbH)
    90
    Epionics Medical GmbH epionics spine system
    Epionics Spine System, supplied by Epionics Medical GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/epionics+spine/epionics+spine/pm40473750-61-19-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    epionics spine system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    epionics spine  (Epionics Medical GmbH)
    90
    Epionics Medical GmbH epionics spine
    Epionics Spine, supplied by Epionics Medical GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/epionics+spine/epionics+spine/pm40015364-15-27-33
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    epionics spine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    epionics spine device  (Epionics Medical GmbH)
    90
    Epionics Medical GmbH epionics spine device
    Epionics Spine Device, supplied by Epionics Medical GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/epionics+spine/spine+device/pm40015364-70-28-28
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    epionics spine device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results